Environmental Forensic Investigation of PFAS Sources, Landfill Operations, Leachate Management, Groundwater Migration, and Emerging Regulatory Liabilities
Project Overview
This environmental forensic investigation evaluated the occurrence, management, and potential environmental release of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) associated with a regional municipal solid waste management system that includes active and closed landfills, an industrial waste monofill, materials recovery operations, landfill gas infrastructure, and leachate management systems. The investigation incorporated landfill engineering information, groundwater monitoring data, regulatory developments, facility operational records, publicly available planning documents, litigation records, and technical guidance concerning PFAS occurrence, transport, and regulatory compliance. The objective of the investigation was to assess how PFAS-containing wastes may enter landfill systems, the mechanisms through which these compounds may migrate into the surrounding environment, and the potential implications of evolving federal regulations for landfill owners and operators.
A principal component of the investigation focused on understanding the relationship between historical waste disposal practices and the long-term management of PFAS within landfill environments. The reviewed materials described a waste management system consisting of a municipal solid waste landfill, multiple closed landfill units, an industrial monofill accepting baled carpet waste, recycling facilities, landfill gas recovery infrastructure, and associated leachate collection systems. Because the surrounding region has historically supported extensive carpet manufacturing, the investigation considered whether industrial waste streams, consumer products, wastewater residuals, and other discarded materials may have introduced significant quantities of PFAS into landfill disposal areas over multiple decades.
Another major aspect of the investigation involved evaluating the potential environmental pathways through which PFAS may migrate after disposal. Technical materials reviewed during the investigation identified landfill leachate as one of the primary mechanisms by which PFAS may be transported from disposal cells to wastewater treatment facilities or surrounding environmental media. Historical operational information also documented changes in leachate management practices over time, including the transition from recirculation and off-site hauling to direct conveyance through a dedicated sewer connection. In addition to leachate transport, the investigation considered potential releases through groundwater migration, surface water runoff, and landfill gas emissions, recognizing that multiple pathways may contribute to environmental distribution depending on landfill design, waste composition, hydrogeologic conditions, and operational practices.
Groundwater conditions represented another important component of the technical evaluation. Available monitoring reports and conceptual groundwater flow information were reviewed to evaluate reported groundwater movement beneath the landfill property and to identify potential downgradient migration pathways. Additional conceptual analyses considered inferred groundwater flow directions toward nearby creeks and adjacent surface water bodies where monitoring coverage may be limited. These evaluations were intended to provide a preliminary understanding of contaminant migration pathways while recognizing that additional monitoring locations would be necessary to fully characterize off-site groundwater flow conditions.
The investigation further examined the rapidly evolving regulatory framework governing PFAS management in the United States. Materials reviewed included recent federal actions designating certain PFAS compounds as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), proposed revisions to wastewater discharge regulations, anticipated landfill effluent limitations, future monitoring requirements, and ongoing development of destruction and disposal guidance. These regulatory developments were evaluated collectively to understand how changing federal requirements may influence landfill operations, leachate management practices, treatment technologies, compliance obligations, and future environmental liabilities.
An additional component of the investigation considered the legal and operational context surrounding PFAS contamination in areas with extensive historical industrial use. Publicly available litigation records, regulatory proceedings, and governmental documents were reviewed to understand how landfill operations may intersect with broader regional PFAS investigations involving industrial manufacturers, wastewater treatment facilities, and downstream environmental receptors. Rather than focusing solely on individual disposal activities, the investigation evaluated the landfill as one component of a larger regional PFAS management system involving waste generation, collection, disposal, wastewater treatment, groundwater transport, and potential environmental exposure pathways.
Collectively, the reviewed materials supported a multidisciplinary environmental forensic investigation integrating landfill engineering, contaminant fate and transport, hydrogeology, environmental chemistry, regulatory analysis, waste management practices, groundwater evaluation, and environmental liability assessment. By synthesizing engineering documentation, operational records, conceptual site evaluations, regulatory developments, and environmental investigations, the project developed a scientifically supported framework for evaluating potential PFAS sources, migration pathways, regulatory obligations, and future environmental management considerations associated with complex landfill systems.
Chemicals of Concern
The principal chemicals evaluated during this environmental forensic investigation were per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), with particular emphasis on perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). These compounds were selected because of their extensive historical use in consumer and industrial products, their exceptional environmental persistence, and recent regulatory actions identifying PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Unlike investigations involving a single industrial release, this evaluation focused on the accumulation, management, transport, and potential environmental release of PFAS from a complex municipal solid waste management system containing multiple historical and active waste disposal facilities.
PFOA and PFOS were identified as the primary chemicals of concern because of their widespread historical use throughout the carpet manufacturing industry and numerous consumer products. Since the 1950s, PFAS compounds have been incorporated into stain-resistant carpets, upholstery, food packaging, waterproof textiles, non-stick coatings, firefighting foams, and numerous industrial applications. Because municipal landfills serve as the ultimate disposal location for many of these products, the investigation considered whether decades of waste disposal may have resulted in substantial PFAS inventories within both active and closed landfill units. Regional industrial activities, particularly historical carpet manufacturing, were identified as an additional factor that could contribute elevated PFAS loading compared to many municipal landfills elsewhere in the United States.
The investigation also evaluated landfill leachate as one of the primary environmental media through which PFAS may migrate. As precipitation infiltrates landfill waste, water can dissolve and mobilize PFAS compounds before entering engineered leachate collection systems. Historical operational records indicated that collected leachate has been managed through multiple approaches over time, including recirculation within landfill cells, off-site transport, and direct conveyance to a publicly owned treatment works (POTW). Because conventional wastewater treatment facilities are generally not designed specifically for PFAS destruction, the investigation considered how landfill leachate management practices may influence the movement of PFAS beyond landfill boundaries.
Groundwater represented another important environmental medium evaluated during the investigation. The technical materials reviewed included groundwater monitoring information and conceptual flow interpretations developed for the landfill property. Because PFAS compounds are generally resistant to chemical degradation and may remain mobile under many groundwater conditions, the investigation evaluated reported groundwater flow directions together with inferred downgradient migration pathways toward nearby streams and surface waters. These evaluations provided a conceptual understanding of potential contaminant transport while recognizing that additional monitoring locations would be necessary to fully characterize off-site groundwater conditions.
Surface water was also considered an important environmental receptor. In addition to groundwater migration, landfill stormwater runoff and permitted or unpermitted discharges may provide additional mechanisms by which PFAS can reach nearby creeks, rivers, and downstream aquatic systems. The investigation therefore considered both engineered drainage systems and natural hydrologic pathways when evaluating the potential movement of contaminants away from disposal areas. Understanding these pathways is particularly important when assessing the long-term environmental fate of highly persistent compounds such as PFAS.
Another chemical transport pathway evaluated during the investigation involved landfill gas. Although landfill gas has traditionally been associated with methane, carbon dioxide, volatile organic compounds, and reduced sulfur compounds, emerging research summarized in the reviewed materials suggests that PFAS may also become associated with particulate matter present within landfill gas streams. Accordingly, the investigation considered landfill gas collection, treatment, and utilization systems as potential pathways requiring further technical evaluation when assessing the complete environmental behavior of PFAS at municipal landfill facilities.
The investigation further evaluated PFAS-containing wastes originating from industrial and commercial activities. Historical information indicated that the waste management system accepted large quantities of carpet waste, carpet padding, paper yarn tubes, plastics, latex-containing materials, industrial sludges, and other manufacturing residuals. Because many of these materials may have contained PFAS used to impart stain resistance or other performance characteristics, the investigation considered both direct disposal of manufactured products and indirect disposal through industrial residuals as potential long-term PFAS sources within landfill disposal units.
Closed landfill units were evaluated separately from the currently operating landfill because historical disposal practices, liner designs, and regulatory requirements have changed substantially over time. Earlier disposal facilities may not have incorporated modern liner systems or leachate collection technologies currently required under Subtitle D landfill regulations. Consequently, the investigation considered whether historical waste placement and older engineering designs could influence the long-term migration of PFAS through groundwater or other environmental pathways.
The investigation additionally recognized that PFAS do not exist as a single chemical but instead comprise a large family of fluorinated compounds possessing different physical, chemical, and toxicological characteristics. While PFOA and PFOS received primary emphasis because of their current regulatory status, the investigation acknowledged that numerous additional PFAS compounds may also be present within landfill wastes, industrial residuals, consumer products, and environmental media. This distinction is important because future regulatory actions may expand beyond currently regulated compounds as scientific understanding of PFAS chemistry continues to evolve.
Collectively, the reviewed materials demonstrated that PFAS contamination associated with municipal landfill systems involves considerably more than the presence of individual chemical compounds. Instead, environmental behavior depends upon waste composition, landfill engineering, leachate management practices, groundwater flow, surface water interactions, atmospheric transport mechanisms, operational history, and evolving regulatory requirements. Evaluating these factors together provides a more comprehensive environmental forensic framework than considering any individual contaminant or transport pathway in isolation.
Methods
This environmental forensic investigation was conducted using accepted principles of environmental forensics, contaminant fate and transport, landfill engineering, hydrogeology, environmental chemistry, waste management, regulatory analysis, and technical document review. Because PFAS contamination associated with municipal landfills involves numerous waste sources, environmental pathways, and evolving regulatory requirements, the investigation integrated engineering records, groundwater monitoring reports, facility planning documents, operational information, regulatory guidance, litigation materials, and publicly available technical references into a comprehensive weight-of-evidence evaluation.
A primary component of the investigation involved review of facility operations and waste management practices. Publicly available planning documents, landfill operational summaries, and engineering descriptions were examined to characterize the integrated solid waste management system, including the municipal solid waste landfill, industrial carpet waste monofill, materials recovery facility, landfill gas collection system, closed landfill units, recycling operations, and household hazardous waste management programs. The evaluation focused on understanding the types of waste historically accepted at the facilities, the engineering characteristics of the disposal units, and operational practices that may influence the accumulation and long-term management of PFAS-containing materials.
The investigation also included evaluation of historical waste streams that may have contributed PFAS to landfill disposal areas. Particular attention was given to industrial waste associated with regional carpet manufacturing, including carpet products, carpet padding, plastics, latex-containing materials, paper yarn tubes, industrial residuals, and other manufacturing byproducts. Because PFAS have historically been incorporated into stain-resistant carpet products and related industrial applications, the investigation assessed whether the regional waste profile may differ substantially from that of a typical municipal landfill. Waste volume information contained within facility planning documents was reviewed to estimate the relative importance of carpet-related materials entering the landfill system.
Another significant component of the investigation involved evaluation of contaminant migration pathways. Technical documentation describing landfill design, liner systems, leachate collection infrastructure, historical leachate management practices, and wastewater disposal methods was reviewed to understand how PFAS could move from waste disposal units into surrounding environmental media. The investigation considered historical changes in leachate management, including recirculation practices, off-site transportation, and direct conveyance to publicly owned wastewater treatment facilities. Additional consideration was given to the potential influence of landfill liner design and engineering modifications on long-term contaminant containment.
Hydrogeologic evaluation represented another important aspect of the investigation. Groundwater monitoring reports and conceptual site figures were reviewed to identify reported groundwater flow directions beneath the landfill property and to evaluate potential downgradient migration pathways. Where monitoring information was limited, conceptual interpretations were developed using reported groundwater gradients together with local drainage features to identify areas where additional hydrogeologic investigation may be warranted. The investigation distinguished between documented groundwater flow directions supported by monitoring data and inferred migration pathways developed through conceptual site evaluation.
The investigation further incorporated review of landfill engineering features that may influence PFAS migration and environmental containment. Engineering documentation describing landfill expansion, alternative liner systems, leachate drainage layers, industrial monofill construction, landfill gas collection infrastructure, and closed landfill units was evaluated to understand how engineering design may affect contaminant transport over time. Because landfill engineering standards have evolved substantially during the development of modern municipal solid waste facilities, historical disposal areas and more recently constructed landfill phases were considered separately where appropriate.
A substantial portion of the investigation consisted of regulatory review. Recent federal actions concerning PFAS were evaluated, including CERCLA hazardous substance designations, proposed revisions to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting requirements, anticipated landfill effluent guidelines, wastewater pretreatment initiatives, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) proposals, and EPA guidance regarding PFAS destruction and disposal technologies. Rather than focusing solely on current regulatory requirements, the investigation considered how anticipated regulatory developments may influence future landfill operations, environmental compliance, treatment technologies, monitoring obligations, and long-term liability.
The investigation also incorporated review of publicly available litigation records and governmental proceedings relevant to regional PFAS contamination. Court filings, regulatory actions, and publicly available legal documents were examined to understand the broader environmental context surrounding PFAS contamination in the surrounding region. These materials were used to identify relationships among industrial manufacturers, wastewater treatment facilities, landfill operations, and environmental receptors without relying exclusively on any single source of information.
An additional component of the investigation involved conceptual evaluation of potential PFAS release mechanisms beyond leachate. Available technical information regarding groundwater migration, stormwater runoff, landfill gas emissions, wastewater discharges, and surface water transport was synthesized into a conceptual site model describing multiple environmental pathways through which PFAS may migrate following disposal. Because each transport mechanism is influenced by different engineering, hydrologic, and operational factors, the investigation evaluated these pathways collectively rather than independently to better understand the overall environmental behavior of PFAS at landfill facilities.
Finally, the investigation employed a multidisciplinary weight-of-evidence methodology integrating landfill engineering, groundwater hydrogeology, environmental chemistry, contaminant transport, regulatory science, facility operations, and environmental forensics. Information obtained from planning documents, engineering reports, groundwater monitoring records, operational summaries, regulatory guidance, and litigation materials was evaluated according to its technical purpose and evidentiary value. Collectively, these independent lines of evidence provided a scientifically supported framework for evaluating PFAS sources, migration pathways, environmental exposure mechanisms, engineering considerations, and potential future regulatory obligations associated with complex municipal landfill systems.
Results
Review of the available technical documentation demonstrated that evaluating PFAS within a municipal landfill system requires integration of landfill engineering, waste management practices, groundwater hydrogeology, environmental chemistry, regulatory analysis, and contaminant fate and transport. Rather than viewing PFAS as a contaminant associated with a single release event, the reviewed materials indicated that landfill facilities represent long-term repositories for numerous PFAS-containing consumer products, industrial wastes, and manufacturing residuals that may continue to influence surrounding environmental media for decades. Collectively, the engineering documents, operational records, groundwater information, regulatory materials, and publicly available litigation records provided multiple independent sources of evidence describing how PFAS may enter, migrate through, and potentially leave complex landfill systems.
One of the principal findings of the investigation was that the regional waste management system possesses several characteristics that distinguish it from many municipal landfill facilities elsewhere in the United States. The reviewed operational information documented an integrated waste management system that includes an active municipal solid waste landfill, an industrial monofill dedicated to baled carpet waste, multiple closed landfill units, a materials recovery facility, and landfill gas recovery infrastructure. The investigation further identified substantial quantities of carpet-related waste historically managed by the facility, suggesting that regional industrial activities may have contributed larger PFAS inventories than those typically associated with conventional municipal solid waste disposal alone.
The investigation also demonstrated that PFAS may enter landfill systems through numerous waste streams rather than a single disposal source. Historical use of PFAS within stain-resistant carpet manufacturing, together with disposal of consumer products, industrial residuals, wastewater sludges, and commercial wastes, indicates that multiple categories of discarded materials have the potential to contribute PFAS to landfill disposal cells. This finding emphasizes that landfill PFAS inventories are the cumulative result of decades of waste disposal practices rather than isolated industrial releases.
Another significant finding involved the complexity of contaminant migration pathways. The reviewed materials demonstrated that landfill leachate represents one of the most important mechanisms through which dissolved PFAS may be transported from disposal cells. Historical operational records documented changes in leachate management practices over time, including recirculation within landfill cells, off-site hauling, and direct transfer to a publicly owned wastewater treatment facility. These operational changes illustrate that PFAS migration cannot be evaluated solely within landfill boundaries but instead requires consideration of downstream wastewater treatment infrastructure and potential environmental discharge pathways.
Groundwater evaluation further demonstrated that subsurface migration represents an additional pathway requiring consideration during PFAS investigations. Available groundwater monitoring information documented reported groundwater flow directions beneath portions of the landfill property, while conceptual interpretations identified additional downgradient areas where groundwater may ultimately migrate toward nearby creeks and surface waters. Although the available monitoring information provides valuable insight into site hydrogeology, the reviewed materials also indicate that additional monitoring locations would likely be required to fully characterize off-site groundwater flow and potential contaminant migration beyond existing monitoring networks.
The investigation additionally demonstrated that landfill engineering characteristics play an important role in evaluating potential PFAS migration. Documentation describing landfill liner systems, alternative engineering designs, leachate collection infrastructure, and historical disposal areas indicates that engineering controls have evolved considerably over time. Consequently, different landfill phases and disposal units may possess substantially different containment characteristics, reinforcing the importance of evaluating historical landfill development rather than treating all disposal areas as engineering equivalents.
A further finding of the investigation involved the rapidly evolving regulatory landscape governing PFAS management. The reviewed federal actions demonstrate that regulatory oversight is transitioning from investigation and research toward formal implementation of enforceable requirements. Recent designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA hazardous substances, together with proposed revisions affecting wastewater discharges, landfill effluent guidelines, NPDES permitting, hazardous constituent listings, and PFAS monitoring, indicates that landfill operators may face increasingly comprehensive compliance obligations as these regulatory initiatives continue to develop.
The investigation also illustrated the importance of evaluating landfill operations within a broader regional environmental framework. Publicly available litigation materials and regulatory proceedings demonstrate that landfill facilities may represent only one component of larger PFAS management systems involving industrial manufacturing, wastewater treatment facilities, municipal infrastructure, and downstream environmental receptors. Evaluating these interconnected systems provides a more comprehensive understanding of potential PFAS sources and migration pathways than considering individual facilities independently.
Another important finding involved the value of integrating multiple independent categories of technical information. Facility planning documents provided information regarding landfill operations and accepted waste streams, groundwater monitoring reports characterized site hydrogeology, engineering documents described containment systems, regulatory materials documented current and anticipated federal requirements, and publicly available litigation records supplied additional regional context regarding PFAS management. No individual source independently characterized every aspect of the environmental system. However, when these independent datasets were evaluated collectively through a weight-of-evidence approach, they established a technically supported framework for assessing PFAS occurrence, environmental transport, landfill engineering, regulatory compliance, and potential future environmental liabilities.
Conclusions
The reviewed technical documentation provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating PFAS management at complex municipal landfill facilities using accepted principles of environmental forensics, landfill engineering, hydrogeology, environmental chemistry, waste management, contaminant fate and transport, and regulatory analysis. The investigation demonstrates that understanding PFAS behavior within landfill systems requires consideration of historical waste disposal practices, engineered containment systems, contaminant migration pathways, and rapidly evolving regulatory requirements rather than focusing solely on individual chemical concentrations or isolated environmental media.
The investigation demonstrated that landfill facilities may serve as long-term repositories for PFAS originating from a wide variety of consumer products, industrial materials, manufacturing residuals, and commercial waste streams. In regions where historical industries made extensive use of PFAS-containing products, landfill operations may receive substantially greater quantities of PFAS than would typically be expected for conventional municipal solid waste disposal alone. Consequently, evaluating the historical types of waste accepted by a landfill can provide important insight into the potential magnitude and distribution of PFAS within disposal units.
The investigation further illustrates that PFAS migration from landfill facilities involves multiple interconnected environmental pathways. Landfill leachate, groundwater movement, stormwater runoff, wastewater treatment systems, and landfill gas all represent potential mechanisms through which PFAS may move beyond disposal cells under certain environmental and operational conditions. Evaluating these pathways collectively provides a more scientifically defensible assessment than considering any single transport mechanism independently, particularly when investigating facilities that have operated for many decades under changing engineering designs and regulatory standards.
Review of the available engineering information also demonstrates the importance of considering historical landfill development when evaluating potential environmental liabilities. Older disposal areas, closed landfill units, evolving liner technologies, modifications to leachate collection systems, and changes in waste management practices may each influence the long-term behavior of PFAS within landfill environments. Accordingly, environmental forensic investigations benefit from reconstructing operational histories rather than evaluating landfill facilities solely on the basis of current operating conditions.
The reviewed regulatory materials further demonstrate that PFAS management is undergoing a period of substantial regulatory transition. Recent federal actions, including CERCLA hazardous substance designations and proposed revisions to wastewater, landfill, and permitting regulations, indicate that landfill operators may encounter increasing monitoring, treatment, reporting, and compliance obligations in the coming years. As scientific understanding and regulatory requirements continue to develop, environmental investigations that integrate engineering evaluations with regulatory analyses will become increasingly important for identifying potential operational risks and long-term environmental liabilities.
More broadly, this investigation demonstrates how environmental consulting can integrate landfill engineering, contaminant fate and transport, hydrogeologic assessment, environmental chemistry, regulatory science, conceptual site modeling, groundwater evaluation, and technical document review into a comprehensive environmental forensic investigation. By combining operational records, engineering documentation, groundwater monitoring information, regulatory developments, and publicly available technical materials, these multidisciplinary investigations provide scientifically supported evaluations of contaminant sources, migration mechanisms, environmental exposure pathways, regulatory obligations, and potential future liabilities associated with complex waste management systems.
This investigation was conducted under the direction of Dr. Paul Rosenfeld, an environmental scientist, environmental forensic expert, and environmental engineer with extensive experience evaluating municipal solid waste landfills, hazardous waste sites, groundwater contamination, landfill gas emissions, PFAS occurrence, contaminant transport, industrial waste management, environmental exposure pathways, and regulatory compliance. Throughout his career, Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated complex environmental systems involving landfills, industrial facilities, wastewater treatment, groundwater contamination, air emissions, PFAS, petroleum hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, metals, pesticides, and numerous other contaminants affecting environmental quality and public health. His work routinely integrates environmental chemistry, hydrogeology, engineering evaluation, contaminant fate and transport, historical reconstruction, regulatory analysis, and technical document review to develop scientifically supported assessments of complex environmental and engineering issues.
References
California Air Resources Board. (2024). Designation of PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances under CERCLA release reporting requirements.
City of Dalton. (2022). Landfill expansion coming later this summer.
Dalton-Whitfield Solid Waste Authority. (2018). Solid Waste Management Plan: November 2018–October 2028.
Dalton-Whitfield Solid Waste Authority. (2024). About Us.
Dalton-Whitfield Solid Waste Authority. (2024). Old Dixie MSW Landfill.
Michigan Waste & Recycling Association & Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. (2019). Michigan statewide study on landfill leachate – PFOA and PFOS impact on water resource recovery facility influent.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2023). Effluent Guidelines Program Plan 15.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). 2024 Interim Guidance on the Destruction and Disposal of PFAS.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Designation of PFOA and PFOS as Hazardous Substances Under CERCLA.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Landfills Effluent Guidelines.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). PFAS Enforcement Discretion and Settlement Policy Under CERCLA.
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Study of PFAS Influent to Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. (2024). In re: Shelby County, Alabama, et al. v. 3M Company, et al., Memorandum Opinion.
United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. (2024). Coosa River Basin Initiative v. City of Calhoun, Georgia, Proposed Consent Decree.