Environmental Forensic Investigation of Wood Treatment Operations, Historical Environmental Releases, and Multimedia Exposure Assessment
Project Overview
Wood preservation facilities have historically played an important role in supporting transportation infrastructure, utility systems, marine construction, and industrial development by extending the service life of timber products exposed to harsh environmental conditions. These facilities have commonly used preservative formulations containing creosote, pentachlorophenol, and waterborne metal-based preservatives to protect wood from fungal decay, insects, and weathering. Although these preservatives significantly improve product durability, their manufacture, storage, treatment operations, and handling can create potential releases to air, soil, groundwater, surface water, and sediment if not properly controlled. Evaluating historical environmental impacts from wood treatment operations therefore requires integrating industrial engineering, environmental chemistry, hydrogeology, atmospheric science, toxicology, environmental fate and transport, and quantitative exposure assessment within a comprehensive environmental forensic framework (U.S. EPA, 1989; ASTM International, 2021).
RoseyFields conducted a multidisciplinary environmental forensic investigation involving a historical wood preservation facility to evaluate the nature and extent of environmental contamination, reconstruct historical release mechanisms, characterize contaminant transport through multiple environmental media, and assess potential human and ecological exposure pathways. The investigation integrated historical operational information, remedial investigation reports, environmental monitoring data, engineering evaluations, hydrogeologic characterization, air dispersion modeling, conceptual site modeling, and regulatory documentation to develop a scientifically supported understanding of long-term environmental conditions. Rather than evaluating a single environmental medium in isolation, the investigation considered contaminant migration through soil, groundwater, surface water, sediment, and ambient air using multiple independent lines of scientific evidence to reduce uncertainty and strengthen the overall exposure assessment (U.S. EPA, 1989; Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2018).
A principal component of the investigation involved reconstructing historical facility operations and identifying the environmental processes responsible for contaminant migration. Historical treatment methods, preservative usage, process modifications, waste management practices, stormwater systems, groundwater conditions, and historical remedial activities were evaluated to develop a comprehensive conceptual site model describing contaminant sources, transport mechanisms, exposure pathways, and potential receptors. Engineering evaluations were integrated with historical environmental investigations to distinguish between primary source areas, secondary migration pathways, and long-term environmental redistribution processes. Developing this conceptual understanding was essential for accurately interpreting environmental monitoring data and evaluating the relative contribution of multiple contaminant transport mechanisms over several decades (National Research Council, 2013; ASTM International, 2021).
The investigation also incorporated environmental chemistry, hydrogeologic analysis, atmospheric transport evaluation, and quantitative exposure assessment to characterize how contaminants migrated through complex environmental systems following historical releases. Soil investigations were integrated with groundwater evaluations, surface water and sediment sampling, environmental monitoring records, and engineering analyses to evaluate contaminant persistence, mobility, and long-term environmental behavior. By combining multiple scientific disciplines within a unified environmental forensic investigation, RoseyFields developed a technically rigorous assessment suitable for environmental consulting, regulatory investigations, remediation planning, natural resource damage evaluations, and expert witness services involving complex industrial contamination. This multidisciplinary approach provides a scientifically defensible framework for understanding historical environmental releases while preserving complete confidentiality regarding the underlying project (U.S. EPA, 1989; Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2020).
Chemicals of Concern
Wood preservation operations have historically relied on several classes of chemical preservatives designed to protect timber from biological degradation, insect attack, fungal decay, and weathering. Depending on the treatment process and intended wood application, preservatives have included creosote, pentachlorophenol (PCP), waterborne copper-based formulations, and inorganic metals such as arsenic, chromium, copper, and zinc. Because these chemicals exhibit substantially different physical, chemical, and toxicological properties, evaluating their environmental behavior requires integrating environmental chemistry, hydrogeology, atmospheric science, soil science, toxicology, and contaminant fate and transport within a comprehensive environmental forensic investigation (U.S. EPA, 1989; ATSDR, 2002).
Creosote is a complex mixture consisting primarily of hundreds of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phenolic compounds, and heterocyclic organic chemicals produced during coal tar distillation. Individual PAHs vary considerably in volatility, persistence, and toxicity. Lower molecular weight PAHs tend to partition more readily into the atmosphere, while higher molecular weight PAHs preferentially sorb to soils, sediments, and organic matter where they may persist for extended periods. Because creosote contains numerous individual constituents with differing environmental behaviors, evaluating historical releases requires considering each transport pathway independently rather than treating creosote as a single chemical. This complexity makes creosote investigations particularly well suited to multidisciplinary environmental forensic evaluations integrating air modeling, soil characterization, groundwater assessment, and environmental chemistry (ATSDR, 2002; U.S. EPA, 2008).
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) has also been widely used as a wood preservative because of its effectiveness against fungal organisms and wood-destroying insects. Unlike many individual organic compounds, PCP exhibits chemical properties that allow it to partition among soil, groundwater, surface water, and atmospheric media depending upon local environmental conditions such as pH, temperature, soil organic carbon content, and groundwater chemistry. Historical releases may therefore result in complex contaminant distributions that evolve over decades through dissolution, sorption, volatilization, biodegradation, and groundwater migration. In addition, historical PCP formulations often contained trace quantities of chlorinated dioxins and furans that require careful evaluation during remedial investigations because of their persistence and toxicological significance (ATSDR, 2001; U.S. EPA, 1989).
Waterborne preservative systems introduce an additional class of contaminants commonly encountered during environmental investigations of wood treatment facilities. Copper-based preservatives may also contain chromium, arsenic, zinc, or other inorganic constituents depending upon the specific formulation used during various historical treatment periods. Unlike many organic contaminants, these metals do not degrade over time but instead undergo changes in oxidation state, solubility, and chemical speciation that influence their environmental mobility and bioavailability. Consequently, investigations involving historical wood treatment operations frequently require integrating geochemistry, groundwater hydrogeology, soil mineralogy, and aqueous chemistry to evaluate contaminant migration and long-term environmental stability (National Research Council, 2013; Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2020).
Because multiple preservative formulations were frequently used during different operational periods, environmental investigations rarely involve a single contaminant or exposure pathway. Instead, contaminants may migrate simultaneously through soil, groundwater, stormwater, surface water, sediment, and ambient air while interacting with complex environmental processes governing transport and persistence. Developing an accurate understanding of these interactions requires constructing a comprehensive conceptual site model that integrates historical operations, contaminant source areas, environmental monitoring data, hydrogeologic conditions, engineering evaluations, environmental chemistry, and exposure science. This multidisciplinary approach provides the scientific foundation for environmental consulting, remedial investigations, risk assessment, remediation planning, and expert witness services involving historical industrial contamination while ensuring that long-term environmental behavior is evaluated using accepted scientific principles (ASTM International, 2021; Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2018).
Methods
A comprehensive environmental forensic investigation was conducted to evaluate historical environmental releases associated with wood preservation operations using accepted methodologies from environmental engineering, hydrogeology, environmental chemistry, atmospheric science, industrial hygiene, toxicology, and quantitative exposure assessment. The investigation integrated historical operational records, engineering evaluations, environmental monitoring data, remedial investigation reports, hydrogeologic studies, air dispersion modeling, and conceptual site modeling to reconstruct historical contaminant releases and characterize the migration of contaminants through multiple environmental media. Rather than evaluating individual datasets independently, the investigation employed a weight-of-evidence approach that combined multiple scientific disciplines to develop a comprehensive understanding of contaminant fate, transport, and potential human exposure (U.S. EPA, 1989; ASTM International, 2021).
The investigation began with a detailed review of historical facility operations, treatment processes, preservative usage, waste handling practices, stormwater management systems, and historical environmental investigations. Engineering documentation was evaluated to identify potential contaminant source areas, historical release mechanisms, process modifications, and environmental control measures implemented throughout the facility’s operational history. Historical production information, environmental compliance records, and operational changes were reviewed to understand how industrial practices evolved over time and how these changes may have influenced contaminant releases to soil, groundwater, surface water, sediment, and ambient air (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2018; U.S. EPA, 1989).
Environmental investigations included evaluation of soil, groundwater, surface water, and sediment data to characterize contaminant distribution and migration. Hydrogeologic information was reviewed to evaluate groundwater flow direction, hydraulic gradients, aquifer characteristics, and contaminant transport mechanisms influencing long-term migration. Environmental chemistry principles were applied to assess adsorption, desorption, dissolution, volatilization, biodegradation, and other processes affecting contaminant mobility and persistence under varying site conditions. These evaluations were incorporated into a conceptual site model describing contaminant sources, migration pathways, exposure routes, and potential receptors across multiple environmental media (National Research Council, 2013; Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2020).
Airborne emissions were evaluated using engineering analyses together with atmospheric dispersion modeling to characterize the potential transport of volatile and semi-volatile compounds beyond the facility boundary. Source characterization incorporated process equipment, material handling operations, storage areas, and other potential emission sources identified during the engineering review. Representative meteorological conditions, source parameters, terrain, and building influences were incorporated into regulatory air dispersion modeling to estimate ambient air concentrations and evaluate historical community exposure. Atmospheric modeling results were considered together with environmental monitoring data, odor information, engineering evaluations, and historical operational records to develop a comprehensive understanding of airborne contaminant transport (American Meteorological Society & U.S. EPA, 2019; U.S. EPA, 2017).
Finally, environmental monitoring information, engineering analyses, hydrogeologic evaluations, atmospheric dispersion modeling, and toxicological reference values were integrated into a quantitative exposure assessment. Potential exposure pathways were evaluated for soil, groundwater, surface water, sediment, and ambient air using accepted risk assessment methodologies. Rather than relying upon a single line of evidence, the investigation synthesized multiple independent scientific datasets to develop a technically rigorous environmental forensic evaluation capable of supporting environmental consulting, regulatory investigations, remediation planning, natural resource damage evaluations, and expert witness services involving historical industrial contamination. This multidisciplinary methodology substantially reduced uncertainty while providing a scientifically defensible reconstruction of historical environmental conditions (U.S. EPA, 1989; National Research Council, 2013).
Results
The environmental forensic investigation demonstrated that historical wood preservation operations can result in complex contaminant distributions across multiple environmental media, requiring an integrated evaluation of soil, groundwater, surface water, sediment, and ambient air to accurately characterize long-term environmental conditions. Historical operational practices, engineering controls, site hydrogeology, and contaminant-specific chemical properties collectively influenced the transport, persistence, and distribution of contaminants throughout the environment. Evaluating these interacting processes using multiple independent datasets produced a more comprehensive understanding of historical releases than could be achieved through any single environmental investigation alone (U.S. EPA, 1989; ASTM International, 2021).
Environmental monitoring data demonstrated that contaminant migration reflected both historical source areas and the physical and chemical processes governing long-term environmental transport. Soil investigations identified historical release areas that served as continuing sources for contaminant migration, while groundwater evaluations characterized dissolved contaminant transport within the subsurface. Surface water and sediment investigations further illustrated how stormwater runoff, groundwater discharge, erosion, and sediment transport contributed to the redistribution of contaminants beyond their original release locations. Integrating these environmental datasets within a unified conceptual site model improved interpretation of environmental conditions and strengthened the scientific basis for evaluating historical contaminant migration (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2020; National Research Council, 2013).
Engineering evaluations indicated that changes in facility operations, treatment technologies, material handling practices, waste management procedures, and environmental controls influenced both the magnitude and distribution of historical releases over time. Historical modifications to process equipment, containment systems, and pollution control measures were considered together with environmental monitoring information to reconstruct how contaminant sources evolved throughout the operational history of the facility. Incorporating these engineering evaluations into the environmental forensic investigation reduced uncertainty associated with interpreting historical environmental conditions and provided important context for understanding long-term contaminant transport (ASTM International, 2021; U.S. EPA, 1989).
Atmospheric evaluations demonstrated that airborne transport represented an additional pathway contributing to environmental distribution of volatile and semi-volatile compounds associated with wood preservation operations. Air dispersion modeling, engineering source characterization, and meteorological analyses were integrated to evaluate historical airborne transport under representative operating conditions. These evaluations complemented soil and groundwater investigations by providing insight into potential off-site transport through the atmosphere and helping to distinguish airborne deposition from other environmental transport mechanisms. Considering atmospheric pathways together with subsurface migration produced a more complete assessment of long-term environmental exposure than evaluating individual pathways independently (American Meteorological Society & U.S. EPA, 2019; U.S. EPA, 2017).
Overall, the investigation demonstrated that integrating engineering analyses, environmental chemistry, hydrogeology, atmospheric science, conceptual site modeling, environmental monitoring, contaminant fate and transport, and quantitative exposure assessment produced a scientifically rigorous environmental forensic evaluation of historical industrial contamination. The multidisciplinary approach substantially reduced uncertainty associated with historical reconstruction, strengthened interpretation of environmental monitoring data, and provided a technically defensible framework for environmental consulting, remediation planning, regulatory investigations, natural resource damage evaluations, and expert witness services involving complex contaminated sites. By synthesizing multiple independent scientific disciplines, the investigation developed a comprehensive understanding of historical contaminant releases and long-term environmental behavior while remaining consistent with accepted environmental engineering and forensic science practices (National Research Council, 2013; Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, 2018).
Conclusions
This environmental forensic investigation demonstrated that evaluating historical contamination associated with wood preservation facilities requires a multidisciplinary scientific approach capable of addressing complex contaminant behavior across multiple environmental media. Historical wood treatment operations frequently involve preservative systems containing mixtures of organic compounds and inorganic constituents that migrate differently through soil, groundwater, surface water, sediment, and ambient air depending on their physical and chemical properties, release mechanisms, and local environmental conditions. By integrating environmental engineering, hydrogeology, environmental chemistry, atmospheric science, toxicology, conceptual site modeling, and quantitative exposure assessment, the investigation developed a comprehensive understanding of contaminant fate and transport while reducing uncertainty through multiple independent lines of evidence. This approach is consistent with accepted environmental forensic practice and provides a substantially more robust scientific foundation than evaluating any single environmental pathway or dataset in isolation.
A principal finding of the investigation was the importance of reconstructing historical operations and source areas in order to interpret present-day environmental conditions. Engineering evaluations demonstrated that historical treatment methods, preservative usage, stormwater systems, waste handling practices, and remedial activities can strongly influence the magnitude, distribution, and persistence of contamination over time. Because wood preservation facilities often operated for decades under evolving industrial practices and regulatory requirements, understanding historical process changes is essential for distinguishing primary source areas from secondary migration pathways and for accurately evaluating long-term contaminant transport. Integrating historical engineering information with environmental monitoring data and hydrogeologic analysis therefore served as a critical component of the overall exposure reconstruction and strengthened the technical defensibility of the investigation.
The investigation further demonstrated the value of evaluating contaminant migration across multiple environmental media rather than focusing exclusively on a single pathway. Soil and groundwater investigations provided important information regarding source areas and subsurface migration, while surface water and sediment evaluations helped characterize contaminant redistribution through runoff, erosion, and groundwater discharge. Atmospheric evaluations provided an additional line of evidence for understanding the transport of volatile and semi-volatile compounds beyond facility boundaries and for assessing potential airborne exposure and deposition pathways. Considering these pathways collectively within a unified conceptual site model allowed the investigation to evaluate the interaction between contaminant chemistry, environmental transport processes, and potential exposure routes in a scientifically rigorous manner. This integrated framework substantially improves the reliability of environmental forensic interpretations, remediation planning, risk evaluation, and expert opinions concerning historical industrial contamination.
This case study highlights the critical role of environmental forensic science in evaluating historical releases from wood treatment operations and reconstructing long-term environmental exposure. By integrating engineering analyses, historical records, environmental monitoring, hydrogeologic characterization, atmospheric dispersion modeling, contaminant fate and transport, conceptual site modeling, and exposure assessment, RoseyFields provides scientifically rigorous evaluations capable of supporting environmental consulting, remediation planning, regulatory investigations, natural resource damage evaluations, and expert witness services. These multidisciplinary investigations provide objective, evidence-based scientific analyses that improve understanding of historical industrial contamination while remaining consistent with accepted engineering practice, current environmental science, and evolving regulatory guidance.
This investigation was conducted under the direction of Dr. Paul Rosenfeld, an environmental scientist and environmental forensic expert with extensive experience in historical industrial contamination, multimedia contaminant transport, environmental exposure assessment, and remedial evaluation. Dr. Rosenfeld’s work includes complex investigations involving historical wood treatment operations, preservative-related contamination, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pentachlorophenol (PCP), metals, groundwater migration, air dispersion modeling, contaminant fate and transport, and long-term community and ecological exposure evaluation. His expertise includes integrating engineering records, environmental monitoring data, hydrogeologic analyses, atmospheric modeling, conceptual site models, and quantitative risk assessment to evaluate whether historical industrial releases have been appropriately characterized across multiple environmental media. Through RoseyFields LLC, Dr. Rosenfeld provides environmental forensic analysis, environmental due diligence, remediation support, regulatory and compliance evaluation, toxic tort and personal injury case assessment, and expert witness testimony involving historical industrial contamination and long-term environmental exposure.
References
American Meteorological Society, & U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2019). AERMOD: Description of model formulation. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2001). Toxicological profile for pentachlorophenol. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2002). Toxicological profile for wood creosote, coal tar creosote, coal tar, coal tar pitch, and coal tar pitch volatiles. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
ASTM International. (2021). Standard guide for environmental forensic investigations. ASTM International.
Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. (2018). Incremental sampling methodology and contaminant investigation framework for complex contaminated sites. Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council.
Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. (2020). Contaminants of concern and remediation management for industrial sites. Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council.
National Research Council. (2013). Alternatives for managing the nation’s complex contaminated groundwater sites. National Academies Press.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989). Risk assessment guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human health evaluation manual (Part A). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2008). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) — technical fact sheet. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2017). Guideline on air quality models (40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.