Industrial Fire and Combustion Emissions Investigation Using Air Dispersion Modeling and Exposure Assessment
Project Overview
This environmental forensic investigation evaluated historical and accidental airborne contaminant releases associated with industrial combustion sources using accepted principles of environmental chemistry, air dispersion modeling, atmospheric science, exposure assessment, and environmental forensics. The investigation integrated historical operational information, engineering evaluations, environmental sampling, air monitoring data, atmospheric dispersion modeling, regulatory documentation, and published scientific literature to characterize contaminant transport, environmental deposition, and potential community exposure. Rather than relying upon a single source of technical information, multiple independent datasets were evaluated to reconstruct historical emission events and assess the extent of environmental impacts within surrounding residential areas.
The investigations involved evaluation of contaminants generated during industrial combustion processes, including particulate matter, dioxins, arsenic, nitrogen oxides, and other combustion byproducts capable of being transported beyond facility boundaries through atmospheric dispersion. Historical soil investigations, air monitoring data, atmospheric modeling, engineering analyses, and exposure assessments were collectively reviewed to characterize contaminant migration, deposition, and long-term environmental persistence. Particular emphasis was placed on reconstructing emission sources, evaluating atmospheric transport, and comparing modeled results with independently collected environmental data to develop scientifically supported conclusions regarding community exposure.
The investigation was performed using accepted principles of environmental forensics, contaminant fate and transport, atmospheric science, air quality assessment, environmental chemistry, toxicology, and quantitative human health risk assessment. Available technical documentation, historical environmental investigations, engineering information, air monitoring data, soil sampling results, dispersion modeling analyses, and peer-reviewed scientific literature were integrated to evaluate contaminant generation, transport, deposition, persistence, and potential exposure pathways. By combining multiple independent lines of scientific evidence, the investigation developed a comprehensive evaluation of environmental conditions consistent with accepted environmental consulting practices and modern environmental forensic methodologies.
Chemicals of Concern
The primary chemicals of concern evaluated during this investigation included dioxins, arsenic, particulate matter (PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀), nitrogen oxides (NOₓ), and a variety of combustion byproducts generated during industrial combustion processes. These contaminants are commonly produced during high-temperature combustion of municipal waste, plastics, and other combustible materials and have been extensively studied because of their potential to migrate through the atmosphere and impact surrounding communities. Evaluation of these contaminants required integration of environmental chemistry, atmospheric science, air dispersion modeling, toxicology, and exposure assessment to characterize historical emissions and their potential environmental and public health implications.
Dioxins represent one of the principal contaminants evaluated during the investigation because they are persistent organic pollutants formed unintentionally during incomplete combustion of chlorine-containing materials. Individual dioxin congeners possess varying toxicities and are therefore commonly evaluated using Toxic Equivalency Factors (TEFs), which convert measured concentrations into Toxic Equivalent (TEQ) values. This standardized methodology allows complex mixtures of dioxins and furans to be compared using a common toxicological framework and is widely accepted by regulatory agencies and the scientific community. Due to their strong affinity for particulate matter and resistance to environmental degradation, dioxins may persist in soils and settled dust for decades following atmospheric deposition, making them particularly useful indicators of historical airborne contamination.
Arsenic was also evaluated as a primary contaminant because it is commonly associated with combustion processes and municipal waste incineration. Once emitted into the atmosphere, arsenic-containing particulate matter may be transported by prevailing winds before depositing onto surrounding soils, vegetation, buildings, and other environmental surfaces. Because arsenic is chemically stable and environmentally persistent, historical deposition may remain detectable long after emissions have ceased, allowing environmental scientists to reconstruct historical contaminant distribution using environmental sampling and accepted environmental forensic methodologies. The investigation incorporated both soil analytical data and atmospheric transport evaluations to characterize historical arsenic deposition within the surrounding environment.
Particulate matter represented another significant contaminant evaluated during the investigation. Fine particulate matter (PM₂.₅) and coarse particulate matter (PM₁₀) are generated during combustion and serve both as regulated air pollutants and as transport mechanisms for other contaminants, including dioxins, metals, and combustion byproducts. Fine particles are capable of remaining suspended in the atmosphere for extended periods and may be transported considerable distances before deposition. Because particulate matter influences both inhalation exposure and contaminant deposition, evaluation of particulate emissions formed an essential component of the atmospheric transport and exposure assessment performed during the investigation.
Nitrogen oxides (NOₓ) and numerous volatile and semi-volatile combustion products were also considered during the evaluation. High-temperature combustion of plastics and municipal waste produces a complex mixture of combustion gases and organic compounds, including aldehydes, volatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), carbon monoxide, and other irritant gases. The specific composition of combustion emissions varies depending upon combustion temperature, oxygen availability, fuel composition, and fire behavior. Evaluation of these combustion products provided important context for understanding community exposure during active emission events while complementing assessments of particulate matter and persistent environmental contaminants.
The principal exposure pathways evaluated during the investigation included inhalation of airborne contaminants during active emissions together with incidental ingestion of contaminated soils and settled dust following atmospheric deposition. Persistent contaminants such as dioxins and arsenic may accumulate within residential soils, where they remain available for long-term exposure through routine outdoor activities and incidental soil contact. Evaluation of both inhalation and soil exposure pathways provides a more comprehensive understanding of potential environmental impacts than consideration of airborne emissions alone and reflects accepted principles of environmental exposure assessment and quantitative human health risk evaluation.
Finally, the investigation recognized that characterization of airborne contaminant releases requires integration of environmental chemistry, atmospheric science, toxicology, environmental sampling, air dispersion modeling, and quantitative exposure assessment into a unified scientific framework. Published environmental investigations consistently demonstrate that reliable evaluation of combustion-related emissions depends upon the combined interpretation of emission characteristics, atmospheric transport, environmental monitoring, contaminant persistence, and accepted exposure assessment methodologies. Accordingly, this environmental forensic investigation relied upon multiple independent sources of scientific evidence to characterize historical and accidental airborne contaminant releases while remaining consistent with accepted principles of environmental chemistry, environmental forensics, air quality assessment, and human health risk evaluation.
Methods
The investigation was conducted using accepted principles of environmental forensics, environmental chemistry, atmospheric science, air dispersion modeling, contaminant fate and transport, toxicology, and quantitative exposure assessment. Because environmental contamination investigations involving historical industrial operations and accidental combustion events frequently require reconstruction of emissions that occurred under variable operating conditions, the evaluation integrated multiple independent sources of technical information to characterize contaminant generation, atmospheric transport, environmental deposition, and potential community exposure. Rather than relying upon a single category of evidence, the investigation incorporated engineering evaluations, historical operational information, air monitoring data, environmental sampling, air dispersion modeling, regulatory documentation, and peer-reviewed scientific literature to develop a scientifically supported assessment of environmental impacts. This multidisciplinary approach is consistent with accepted environmental consulting practices for evaluating airborne contaminant releases and reconstructing historical exposure conditions.
A substantial component of the investigation involved review of historical engineering information and source-term development. Available operational records, engineering evaluations, incident documentation, and published emission factors were reviewed to characterize contaminant generation associated with industrial processes and combustion events. Source-term reconstruction considered the quantity and composition of combustible materials, combustion conditions, emission duration, and other operational characteristics capable of influencing contaminant emissions. These engineering evaluations provided the technical foundation for subsequent atmospheric dispersion modeling and environmental exposure assessment.
The investigation also incorporated extensive evaluation of ambient air monitoring data collected during and following the emission events. Air monitoring performed by multiple organizations was reviewed to characterize airborne concentrations of particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and other combustion-related contaminants. Data from multiple monitoring locations were compared to evaluate spatial variations in contaminant concentrations and to assess consistency with predicted atmospheric transport patterns. Integration of independently collected monitoring data provided an important line of scientific evidence supporting the evaluation of community exposure and atmospheric dispersion.
Air dispersion modeling represented a central component of the environmental evaluation. Accepted atmospheric dispersion modeling techniques were utilized to estimate airborne contaminant concentrations and particulate deposition throughout the surrounding area. Modeling incorporated reconstructed emission rates together with representative meteorological conditions, source characteristics, terrain information, and receptor grids to estimate contaminant transport and deposition. Predicted concentrations were then compared with environmental monitoring data and available environmental sampling results to evaluate the consistency between modeled emissions and observed environmental conditions. This comparison between independent datasets provides an important scientific basis for environmental forensic investigations involving airborne contaminant releases.
Environmental sampling data were also reviewed to characterize long-term contaminant accumulation within environmental media. Available soil analytical results and other environmental sampling information were evaluated to determine whether observed contaminant concentrations were consistent with historical atmospheric deposition. Because persistent contaminants such as dioxins and arsenic remain within surface soils for extended periods following deposition, environmental sampling provides valuable scientific evidence regarding historical contaminant distribution and long-term environmental persistence. Integration of environmental sampling with atmospheric modeling strengthened the technical evaluation by providing multiple independent lines of evidence regarding contaminant transport and deposition.
The investigation further incorporated accepted principles of toxicology and quantitative exposure assessment. Environmental concentrations derived from air monitoring, environmental sampling, and air dispersion modeling were evaluated using established exposure assumptions and published toxicological criteria to characterize potential community exposures. Consideration was given to both short-term inhalation exposures occurring during active emission events and longer-term exposure pathways associated with contaminant deposition within residential soils and settled dust. Evaluation of multiple exposure pathways provided a comprehensive assessment of potential environmental impacts while remaining consistent with accepted human health risk assessment methodologies.
Regulatory guidance and peer-reviewed scientific literature were reviewed throughout the investigation to ensure consistency with accepted environmental investigation practices. Published guidance addressing air dispersion modeling, combustion emissions, particulate matter, dioxins, arsenic, exposure assessment, and environmental sampling was evaluated together with regulatory documentation and historical investigations. Comparison of investigation findings with accepted scientific literature provided additional confidence that the methodologies employed during the investigation reflected recognized principles of environmental chemistry, atmospheric science, and environmental forensics.
Finally, the investigation employed accepted principles of uncertainty evaluation that are fundamental to environmental forensic science. Historical environmental investigations inherently involve uncertainty because emission characteristics, meteorological conditions, and environmental sampling opportunities vary over time. Rather than relying upon any single dataset, the investigation addressed these uncertainties by integrating engineering analyses, source-term reconstruction, air monitoring, atmospheric dispersion modeling, environmental sampling, toxicological evaluation, and exposure assessment into a comprehensive weight-of-evidence framework. This multidisciplinary approach provides a scientifically reliable basis for reconstructing historical contaminant releases while remaining consistent with accepted principles of environmental forensics, environmental chemistry, air quality assessment, and quantitative human health risk evaluation.
Results
Review of the available technical documentation demonstrated that historical and accidental airborne contaminant releases could be evaluated using a scientifically defensible combination of source-term reconstruction, air monitoring, air dispersion modeling, environmental sampling, engineering evaluations, and quantitative exposure assessment. Although individual environmental measurements represent conditions at a specific point in time, the investigation integrated multiple independent datasets collected during and following the emission events to characterize contaminant generation, atmospheric transport, deposition, and potential community exposure. Collectively, these complementary sources of information provided a comprehensive scientific framework for reconstructing environmental conditions using accepted principles of environmental forensics and atmospheric science.
One of the principal findings of the investigation was the strong agreement between reconstructed emissions, air dispersion modeling, ambient air monitoring, and environmental observations. Engineering evaluations were used to estimate contaminant emissions associated with industrial combustion, while atmospheric dispersion modeling predicted the movement of smoke, particulate matter, and combustion byproducts throughout the surrounding area. Independently collected air monitoring data and environmental observations demonstrated patterns that were consistent with the modeled distribution of airborne contaminants, providing multiple independent lines of scientific evidence supporting the reconstruction of contaminant transport and community exposure. Comparison of modeled concentrations with measured environmental data substantially strengthened the overall environmental forensic evaluation.
The investigation further demonstrated the value of integrating real-time air monitoring with atmospheric dispersion modeling during evaluation of large-scale combustion events. Air monitoring conducted by multiple organizations characterized concentrations of particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, and other combustion-related pollutants during active emissions, while atmospheric modeling provided spatial estimates of contaminant transport beyond monitored locations. Evaluation of these complementary datasets demonstrated that monitoring and modeling together provide a more comprehensive characterization of airborne contaminant distribution than either methodology alone. This integrated approach reduced uncertainty while improving confidence in the interpretation of community exposure conditions.
Evaluation of environmental sampling data also demonstrated the importance of long-term environmental media in characterizing historical airborne contamination. Persistent contaminants identified within soil and other environmental media reflected the cumulative effects of atmospheric deposition over time and provided an independent line of evidence supporting historical contaminant migration. Because contaminants such as dioxins and arsenic remain relatively stable within surface soils, environmental sampling complemented air monitoring by documenting long-term environmental accumulation and providing additional scientific support for reconstructing historical emission patterns.
The investigation additionally demonstrated that contaminant transport and deposition were influenced by a combination of emission characteristics, meteorological conditions, atmospheric stability, particle size, and combustion behavior. Air dispersion modeling incorporated these variables to estimate airborne concentrations and deposition patterns throughout the surrounding area. Comparison of modeled results with environmental monitoring and sampling data demonstrated that accepted atmospheric transport principles provided a scientifically reliable framework for evaluating contaminant migration and identifying areas potentially affected by airborne emissions. These findings illustrate the importance of integrating engineering analyses with environmental chemistry and atmospheric science when evaluating complex industrial emission events.
The quantitative exposure assessment further demonstrated the utility of combining environmental monitoring, dispersion modeling, and accepted toxicological methodologies to evaluate potential human exposure. Airborne concentrations estimated through monitoring and modeling, together with contaminant concentrations identified within environmental media, were evaluated using accepted exposure assumptions and health-based toxicity criteria. Consideration of both short-term inhalation exposures and longer-term exposure pathways associated with deposited contaminants provided a comprehensive assessment of potential community impacts while remaining consistent with accepted human health risk assessment practices.
Another important finding involved the successful integration of environmental chemistry, atmospheric science, engineering analysis, air monitoring, environmental sampling, and quantitative exposure assessment into a unified environmental forensic framework. No individual dataset independently characterized the complexity of the emission events or resulting environmental conditions. However, when source-term reconstruction, atmospheric dispersion modeling, ambient air monitoring, environmental sampling, engineering evaluations, and exposure assessment were evaluated collectively, they provided a scientifically supported reconstruction of contaminant releases and their environmental impacts. This multidisciplinary, weight-of-evidence approach represents a fundamental principle of modern environmental forensic investigations and provides a technically reliable framework for evaluating historical and accidental airborne contaminant releases.
Conclusions
The available technical documentation provides a comprehensive scientific foundation for evaluating historical and accidental airborne contaminant releases using accepted principles of environmental forensics, environmental chemistry, atmospheric science, air dispersion modeling, contaminant fate and transport, and quantitative human health risk assessment. Although investigations involving large industrial emission events frequently rely upon environmental data collected from multiple independent sources, the integration of source-term reconstruction, ambient air monitoring, atmospheric dispersion modeling, environmental sampling, engineering evaluations, and exposure assessment provides a scientifically reliable framework for reconstructing contaminant releases and evaluating their environmental impacts. This multidisciplinary approach allows environmental professionals to characterize airborne contamination using methodologies that are consistent with accepted scientific practice and widely recognized within the environmental consulting profession.
The investigation demonstrated that airborne contaminant releases are most reliably characterized when engineering analyses, air monitoring, atmospheric dispersion modeling, environmental sampling, regulatory documentation, and quantitative exposure assessments are evaluated collectively rather than independently. This weight-of-evidence approach reduces uncertainty by integrating complementary sources of technical information and allows environmental scientists to reconstruct historical emission events using methodologies that are both scientifically rigorous and consistent with accepted environmental forensic practice. Independent agreement among modeled contaminant concentrations, measured environmental data, and observed environmental conditions provides a technically supported basis for evaluating contaminant transport while recognizing the inherent complexity of industrial combustion events and atmospheric dispersion.
Review of the supporting documentation also illustrates the importance of evaluating airborne contaminant releases within the broader context of atmospheric transport, environmental deposition, and long-term contaminant persistence. Particulate matter, combustion byproducts, dioxins, arsenic, and other pollutants generated during industrial combustion are transported according to well-established atmospheric processes that govern dispersion, dilution, deposition, and environmental accumulation. Environmental forensic investigations that integrate atmospheric modeling, environmental chemistry, engineering evaluations, environmental monitoring, and exposure science provide a more technically accurate understanding of contaminant migration than evaluations based solely upon isolated environmental samples or individual monitoring locations. Consideration of these multiple lines of evidence is therefore essential for developing scientifically defensible interpretations of historical environmental conditions and potential community exposures.
The investigation further demonstrated the value of combining real-time environmental monitoring with long-term environmental sampling and quantitative exposure assessment. Air monitoring characterized contaminant concentrations during active emission periods, while environmental sampling documented contaminant persistence within environmental media following atmospheric deposition. Air dispersion modeling provided a scientific bridge between these independent datasets by estimating contaminant transport and deposition throughout the surrounding area. Integration of these complementary approaches resulted in a comprehensive evaluation of contaminant generation, atmospheric transport, environmental accumulation, and potential human exposure that remained consistent with accepted environmental investigation methodologies.
More broadly, this investigation demonstrates how modern environmental consulting integrates environmental chemistry, atmospheric science, engineering analysis, air quality assessment, toxicology, exposure science, quantitative risk assessment, and environmental forensics to address complex industrial emission events. These multidisciplinary evaluations provide scientifically supported assessments of environmental conditions while remaining grounded in accepted engineering principles, peer-reviewed scientific literature, environmental monitoring data, and objective technical analysis. By combining source-term reconstruction, air dispersion modeling, environmental monitoring, environmental sampling, and quantitative exposure assessment, environmental forensic investigations are able to develop reliable evaluations of airborne contaminant releases that are consistent with recognized scientific practice and contemporary environmental investigation methodologies.
This investigation was conducted under the direction of Dr. Paul Rosenfeld, an environmental scientist, environmental forensic expert, and exposure assessment specialist with more than twenty-five years of experience evaluating industrial air emissions, atmospheric transport, contaminant fate and transport, environmental chemistry, air dispersion modeling, and human health risk. Throughout his career, Dr. Rosenfeld has conducted investigations involving particulate matter, combustion byproducts, dioxins, arsenic, volatile organic compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), petroleum hydrocarbons, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), heavy metals, asbestos, and numerous other environmental contaminants affecting residential communities, occupational settings, ambient air quality, and groundwater resources. His professional experience includes source-term reconstruction, air dispersion modeling, environmental site investigations, quantitative exposure assessment, human health risk assessment, regulatory review, and expert witness testimony involving complex environmental contamination matters.
References
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2002). ToxFAQs™ for Nitrogen Oxides. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (2007). Public Health Assessment Guidance Manual. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
National Fire Protection Association. (2023). Fire Protection Handbook. National Fire Protection Association.
Paabo, M., & Levin, B. C. (1987). A Literature Review of the Chemical Nature and Toxicity of the Decomposition Products of Polyethylenes. Fire and Materials, 11, 55–70.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Health and Environmental Effects of Particulate Matter (PM). Office of Air and Radiation.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Particulate Matter (PM) Basics. Office of Air and Radiation.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Office of Research and Development.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for Chemical Contaminants. Office of Land and Emergency Management.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). User’s Guide for the AERMOD Dispersion Modeling System. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Exposure Factors Handbook. EPA/600/R-09/052F.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). Nitrogen Dioxide (NO₂) Pollution. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
World Health Organization. (2021). WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines. World Health Organization.